This is the last "Tiger" time waster. Promise.
From that tawdry tabloid of record, the WaPo, and one Eugene Robinson; an "I'm not going to pronounce judgment on Woods's moral fiber" columnist:
"Here's my real question, though: What's with the whole Barbie thing?
No offense to anyone who actually looks like Barbie, but it really is striking how much the women who've been linked to Woods resemble one another. I'm talking about the long hair, the specific body type, even the facial features. Mattel could sue for trademark infringement.
This may be the most interesting aspect of the whole Tiger Woods story -- and one of the most disappointing. He seems to have been bent on proving to himself that he could have any woman he wanted. But from the evidence, his aim wasn't variety but some kind of validation...
But the world is full of beautiful women of all colors, shapes and sizes -- some with short hair or almond eyes, some with broad noses, some with yellow or brown skin. Woods appears to have bought into an "official" standard of beauty that is so conventional as to be almost oppressive.
His taste in mistresses leaves the impression of a man who is, deep down, both insecure and image-conscious -- a control freak even when he's committing "transgressions."
So let me get this straight (no pun!) - hater-free, no holds barred, pro-choice sexual 'lifestyles' are for everyone except rich dooods turning their crank with mono-toned skanks??
That's Eugene's complaint?? He won't be judgmental, except to be judgmental that Tiger didn't have racial quotas for his nationwide supply of skanks. You can lie, cheat, and send your kids into therapy till they're middle aged, but make sure there's some shades of brown in there, or you'll be siding with 'da man?'
Un-freekin' believable.
Why deez Leftists always be race pimpin'??
I. JUST. DON'T. GET. IT.