By definition,
Zelensky has confirmed on several occasions: ‘No Blackmail’ in Phone Conversation With Trump
The Trump transcript wrecked the 'Ukraine Whistle Blower' assembly Line. So, why does anyone need to hear testimony from these clandestine whistle blowing clowns manufactured by Adam 'shifty' Schiff (D-CA)? We don't because we can read all about it for ourselves.
Related: Conservative lawmakers demand Schiff's recusal from Trump impeachment inquiry
It's The Hill newspaper, so naturally it white washes a key point which I've corrected:
"Republicans have repeatedly taken issue with how Schiff has handled the inquiry. Trump last month suggested that the chairman should be arrested for treason forexaggerating partsfabricating blatant lies about the president's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky.
Several lawmakers also voiced outrage last week after it was revealed that the committee staffer spoke with the whistle blower.Most suspicious in this manufactured scandal is 'What did Schiff know and when did he know it?'
The congressional aide advised the figure to find a lawyer and to file a formal whistle blower complaint, actions Schiff and other legal experts said are standard procedure.
His arguments did not deter Republicans like Rep. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, who called on Schiff to step down as chairman for failing to share information related to the whistle blower with the panel."
Schiff’s own tweet from August 28th—4 weeks before the transcript was even released. How much did he coordinate with the so-called whistleblower? https://t.co/EYyHyg41Z4— Kevin McCarthy (@GOPLeader) October 9, 2019
Thank you Mr. Branco for the cartoon, and a H/t to Liberty Unyielding.