Videos WhatFinger

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Is there an echo in here?

Not much new in last night's speech. The President spoke on many issues that have been floating in the ether for years. The few items that he sounded moderately passionate about was the the end of catch and release doh! and the emphasis on learning and speaking the English language as a necessary tool for success in this country. All else seemed to be crumbs to pacify. Most of his suggestions will die in squabbling congressional committees.
I give Mr. Bush a 5.

The folks over at Power Line wrote about GW sailing down the porcelain portal.
As soon as he started talking about guest worker programs and the impossibility of deporting 11 million illegals, it was all over. President Bush keeps trying to find the middle ground, on this and many other issues. But sometimes, there isn't a viable middle ground. This is one of those instances.

Some folks liked the speech.
President Bush did exactly what he had to do tonight: Hit the middle, agreeing to the fence, to a large increase in Border Patrol personnel and funding, tamper-proof identification, National Guard back-up of ICE for at least a year, the end of catch-and-release, blunt talk on the impossibility of mass deportation, an insistence on English, and a commitment to a guest worker program that will take pressure off enforcement by funneling large numbers of immigrant workers into the legal line.

The Captain's Quarters split the difference.
My initial reaction? President Bush tried reaching for the center -- a position he has occupied on this issue all along. He tried a one-from-column-A, two-from-column-B approach that probably will leave all sides more or less dissatisfied. His declaration that catch-and-release would end was the most welcome news in the entire speech. He delivered that well and sounded forceful and presidential, but most people will wonder why this practice didn't end on September 12, 2001. His tone remained measured and firm and he insisted that Congress pass a comprehensive plan that includes both tight security and normalization.

I still prefer Burt Prelutsky's analysis that he wrote two weeks before GW even walked up to the podium!
Dang, this guy is good.

Is there an echo in here?