"Sexpelled"

You've got to be kidding. That's it? That's the best you've got??

The darwinist's 60 second youtube response to 'Expelled'.
Yes, it's safe for work.



Nana-nana-boo-boo.

My brother simply said, "The video is yet another example of one side arguing with facts and the other side arguing with ridicule!"

I labeled it an 'infantile comeback'. hehehehe I crack myself up sometimes. But, you know, some people need that 'crutch of faith' that darwinism demands. (!)

It all kinda reminds me of the ridicule 'Darwin's Black Box' author, Dr. Micheal Behe, received from critics who wore 'reduced' mouse trap tie clips in a solidarity protest over Behe's audacious questioning of darwinist dogma. But the adolescent retort from the darwinists was a non sequitur - one can't use intelligently designed & directed man made objects to hail victory about the purposeless bedrock of macro-evolutionary theory, which is naturalism.


Besides, the 'reduced' mouse trap tie clips were no longer mouse traps. They were something else entirely - intelligently designed & directed man made objects for a different purpose. Or, if the 'reduced' mouse trap tie clips were still mouse traps, they were a different species of mouse trap. Behe's whole point. Game over.

Same for the nana-nana-boo-boo youtube response from the darwinists. Obviously, child birth is a quit common, observable, and quantifiable occurrence for scientific analysis, while macro evolution is, well, ...a nice hypothesis. To my knowledge, no one has ever seen it in process - either in the modern era or in millennium past. And, despite millions of fossils on thousands of museum shelves all over the world, for the past 150 years, the quest for 'darwin's holy grail' - those missing links - is still at a fever pitch.

Plus, for all the darwinists' contortions of mechanical prognostications about form, it still leaves unanswered the question of 'where did all this phenomenal amount of DNA information come from?' Anyone familiar with information theory knows that 'information implies intelligence'.

So why all the hub-bub over a silly movie? You'd think Stein whizzed all over a sacred alter, or something. Hmmm. Maybe Stein's hypothesis is true. Maybe some topics aren't open for discussion....

This old joke says a lot:

A little girl asked her father: “How did the human race appear?”
The father answered, “God made Adam and Eve; they had children; and so was all mankind made.”

Two days later the girl asked her mother the same question. The mother answered, “Many years ago there were monkeys from which the human race evolved.”

The confused girl returned to her father and said, “Dad, how is it possible that you told me the human race was created by God, and Mom said they developed from monkeys?”

The father answered, “Well, Dear, it is very simple. I told you about my side of the family, and your mother told you about hers.”

And that's the whole point of Stein's movie: ~ discussion is key.
I.D. has serious scientific flaws; darwinism has serious scientific flaws. But darwin dogma is taken for inerrant gospel which is then force fed to govt. school children everywhere with little or no facts presented about the flawed evidence, circular reasoning, and out right fraud which peppers the gaping holes in this theory.

Why does talking about that make so many prominent people nervous???

Brent Bozell III weighs in with his thoughts here, and a slug fest is going on over there.