That's what David Limbaugh puts forth in this op/ed.
From Ayers/Dohrn to Rashid Khalidi to ACORN to Tony Rezko to his membership in the radical leftist 'New Party' organization, just who the heck is this guy??!
"As if all this weren't enough to culminate in a perfect storm for the next president to transform our system fundamentally, there's also an alarming atmosphere among many Obama supporters. They follow him in a cultlike trance, having no clue what he stands for or what policy meat he would put on his campaign bones of change and hope once in office.
Does anyone doubt that if any Republican presidential candidate had a small fraction of the questionable alliances Obama has, he already would have been hounded into withdrawing from the race?"
Charles Krauthammer throws Jeremiah Wright into these associations, and deems Obama not only cynical and ruthless, but indecent.
"Would you attend a church whose pastor was spreading racial animosity from the pulpit? Would you even shake hands with — let alone serve on two boards with — an unrepentant terrorist, whether he bombed U.S. military installations or abortion clinics?"
RM over at RWNH vents his frustration about everyone else being wrong about this candidate: Obama does not support socialism, or terrorism, or any other kind of 'ism', except opportunism.
"But frankly, Obama is someone who impresses me as having no real ideology save that which can get him elected. His campaign has shown him to pander to whatever audience he is addressing at the moment. His contradictory positions on issues is simply dismissed as his words “being taken out of context” or the candidate himself “misstated” his position. The press gives him a pass and its off to the next audience where he tells them exactly what they want to hear. This is not a man with a radical ideology."
He's just described just about every lib politician & pundit who can't be pinned down on most anything because they seem to espouse everything, with nothing verboten or unreasonable - lest you be tarred a 'racist' or 'intolerant', etc. It's a hackneyed debate tactic devoid of logic and full of shock value which has contributed to the nanny state cliff we're going over right now.
But I disagree with RM's final assessment. I think Obama is a socialist guided by a marxist philosophy that strives for a class-less society - governed by a tiny managing plutocracy, of which he, and others of the approved party will be members. Of course.
Why else would all these otherwise marginalized people of dubious distinction with criminal pasts & culpable presents be so attracted to this guy??!
Ask your self this: if the republican candidate for president attracted such nefarious creatures as skin heads, white supremacists, the Tim McVey fan club, neo-nazis and other pimples on the bvtt of this species, wouldn't you want to know why that is? I'm sure the msm would hound him/her relentlessly for those answers. And rightly so.
But Barak Obama is the stealth candidate?