Videos WhatFinger

Friday, July 12, 2019

Anglo-Saxons deserve reparations for the Norman Conquest

"The effect on indigenous English society was enduring devastation."

From the sardonic pen of Sahil Mahtani at The Spectator:
"This matters because, just as the pain of colonialism continues to be endured by its descendants, the Conquest continues to have lasting effects. In his study of surnames and social mobility, economic historian Gregory Clark concluded that Norman surnames continue to be 25 per cent overrepresented at Oxbridge to this day relative to other indigenous English surnames. As Clark put it: ‘The fact that Norman surnames had not been completely average in their social distribution by 1300, by 1600, or even by 1900 implies astonishingly slow rates of social mobility during every epoch of English history.’ Not for nothing did Nonconformists and Whigs loudly oppose ‘the Norman yoke’ during the 17th and 18th centuries.

Cambridge University, which still drips with Norman money and influence, should now consider to what extent it needs to compensate its Anglo-Saxon victims. The Sutton Trust estimates that Oxbridge graduates earn £400,000 more during their lifetimes than graduates from other UK universities. These figures imply that descendants of the rapacious Norman invader class could be earning tens of thousands of pounds more than other graduates — an undeserved lifetime premium that has survived 31 generations.  So, reparations must certainly be made.  But who shall pay, and who shall receive?

It should be straightforward for a Royal Commission to trace the present-day descendants of Britain’s Norman usurpers through a combination of genealogical and administrative research as well as — inevitably — mandatory genetic testing. A small tax on the Lampards, Vardys and Gascoignes of the world, payable to the Bamfords, Bransons and Ecclestones, would be sufficient to catalyse healing for the open sores of the past.

What are the sums involved? By 1086, the Norman arrivistes had stolen almost a third of the 12.5 million acres of arable land in England, parcelling it into manorial estates. At a conservative estimate, that land is now worth £7,000 per acre — or £25 billion in total that the Normans owe Anglo-Saxons for the Conquest. France’s liability could, of course, be offset against our exit bill from the EU.

There will be inevitable quibbles, such as descendants of Normans claiming that they were not personally responsible. But this is feeble prattle. Countries typically honour treaties dating hundreds of years in the past, despite no one being alive who signed them. We pay debts accumulated by previous generations. Similarly, reparations correctly depend on a notion of collective and inherited responsibility, precisely why the Jews were held accountable for the death of Jesus Christ for most of the Christian era."
Indeed. Pay up, descendants of the rapacious Norman invader class. The ancient Saxons whose land you stole, women you raped, and men you murdered cry out for Euros. € € €

Of course, those descedants are part of the evil white man horde which invaded the Americas. Reparations are owed to the Pre-Columbian people whose land they stole, women they raped, and men they murdered. The Pre-Columbian people stole the land, raped the women, and murdered the men of the Clovis people, and owe reparations. The Clovis people owe the pre-Clovis people, who, in turn, are owed reparations by those descended from the Beringia migration people who crossed from Asia during the last glacial age, roughly 15,000 years ago.

And we haven't even figured the Africans, yet.

Everyone is owed by everybody, so grab your neighbor's wallet, and help yourself. The only question left is which government agency will confiscate & control it all?

That's how this game is played.